Image: Universal Pictures
Most assumed that because Dr. Dre was a producer of Straight Outta Compton, he
cut all the pieces of his past that made him look bad. These viewers
claimed that he painted himself in the best light possible and made the
movie inaccurate. And maybe Dr. Dre did take some creative license by
omitting his troubles, but if that’s the only thing you take away from Straight Outta Compton, I strongly urge you to watch it again.
The movie gave the backstory and the cultural context of a
tumultuous time in American history, and it allowed unprecedented access
to see exactly what it takes to create a musical genre. A type of music
was created by teenagers. That’s huge. That’s Beatles big.
Straight Outta Compton had three hours to take its
huge audience from the formation of N.W.A. to Aftermath while also
explaining the Los Angeles riots and the AIDS epidemic. What Straight Outta Compton did
was explain that "F*** the Police" wasn't just a bunch of hoodlums
whining about laws. People were really frustrated with the state of
their neighborhood. Keeping out Dr. Dre's past wasn’t a deliberate choice to
rewrite history; it was a decision to focus on what mattered to the
biggest number of people — the music and the cultural impact it made on
California and beyond.
If the movie was a biopic of Dr. Dre and omitted the facts
of his legal trouble, then yes, it would be an obvious misrepresentation
of the truth. But in order to tell the story of N.W.A. and what they
meant to hip-hop, it simply doesn’t matter. And what Straight Outta Compton taught everyone about that period in history is so much more important than mistakes Dr. Dre made as a young man.